In her biography of Aurangzeb, the much-reviled Mughal emperor, Truschke, equally conversant in Persian and Sanskrit, argues that it is meaningless to hang a bad name on the medieval ruler just because he didn’t promote Sanskrit. According to Truschke, he lived at a time when Sanskrit had begun to wane and literary Hindi started to flourish. She uses the scholarly route to demolish many myths about the man who has left a complex legacy.
Romila Thapar’s work and career remain a guiding light for me, and if I am ever one quarter of the historian she is, I will consider my career to be a massive success
A Mellon postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Religious Studies at Stanford University, she is currently researching Sanskrit literary histories of Indo-Islamic political events. Truschke disapproves of efforts to replace history with mythology. “The RSS knows that the complexities of India’s past threaten to undermine their claims of a Hindu Rashtra…. In this project, ignorance is a friend to the RSS and dispassionate history coupled with critical thinking an enemy,” she says.
(For the complete list of power of argument in 50 portraits click here)
More Columns
Why I Don’t Look Back in Anger Boria Majumdar
The Playful Past Rati Girish
“The day you say Modi is 'satisfied’, you can say you are paying homage to him” Open