Navigating the ethical and constitutional boundaries of AI
Ashwani Kumar Ashwani Kumar | 19 Jul, 2024
(Illustration: Saurabh Singh)
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI), as the transformative technological revolution of our age, attests to mankind’s unrelenting pursuit to understand, control and remake the world in the image of its expanding aspirations. But it is an endeavour not without its challenges. The apprehended evisceration of core human values and dehumanising of society through the unfettered use of AI has invited several regional and global initiatives. The aim of these efforts is to limit the deployment of AI within a larger ethical framework of human rights in a harmonious construct between technological exuberance and compelling moral restraints. More recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his recent inaugural speech at the Global IndiaAI Summit reiterated India’s commitment to responsible and ethical use of AI, as an integral component of India’s AI mission.
History proclaims that at every step on the stairway to progress, mankind has made choices to define the progress of civilisation as the deepening of humanity and the happiness of the people. The benefits of AI’s positive contribution to improving global health and educational systems, and combating challenges of climate change, terrorism, cybercrime, pandemics, natural disasters, etc, are transformative in the progressive evolution of human civilisation. Even so, there is an overwhelming consensus amongst stakeholders to tame the excesses of AI. It is rightly argued that the celebration of our technological triumphs cannot be a ‘mourning amidst the ruins’ of humanity. Since all knowledge must be measured in terms of the values it advances, the use of AI demands evaluation in the framework of the prevailing ethical standards of humanity.
AI’s known capacity to encroach upon our inalienable human rights to freedom, privacy of emotions and intimate relationships, individual autonomy, the sacrosanctity of mental processes and individual consciousness, now recognised as fundamental constitutional rights in democracies across the world, is viewed as ‘part of the crisis of humanity’. Grave concerns about AI-enabled manipulation of behavioural and electoral processes, the hacking of language to disrupt genuine democratic discourse, the challenge of deepfakes, intended and unintended biases for and against a class of people by exploiting their vulnerabilities, including age, gender, disabilities and ethnicity, and the compounding of prevailing inequalities, including the digital divide, etc, are real. Serious apprehensions have been expressed about AI’s ability ‘to effectively reshape history’. Concerns about the “overgrazing of the internet commons by rapacious technology companies” to maximise profit at the cost of data privacy and transparency abound. Doubts have been expressed whether the AI machines can serve as moral agents in “translating human moral complexity into an algorithmic form” or are capable of making ethical judgments as “full ethical agents” with the human understanding of ethics.
A robust AI governance system cannot be limited to self-regulation and should have enforceable provisions to fix accountability for transgression of the mandated red lines
That the AI leviathan needs to be regulated across geographical boundaries by internationally enforceable protocols is evident in the recent comments of the principal AI entrepreneurs, including Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Steve Wozniak. Evidently, a robust AI governance system cannot be limited to self-regulation and should have enforceable provisions to fix accountability for transgression of the mandated red lines. It is, indeed, necessary to navigate the shadows of science if we are to bask in the glory of its illumination.
Hopefully, the recently concluded New Delhi Global IndiaAI Summit will generate ideas for the responsible development and deployment of ethical and inclusive AI. It is for us to reaffirm that civilisation at its peak is about the elevation of man in the fullness of human glory, not in a tragic, even though unintended, denouement of humanist morality. Our ability to secure a convergence in the prescription of scientists and philosophers for a humane world order will be an enduring contribution to this mission. How we deal with this epochal challenge will define the quality of leadership and the hierarchy of moral values in which human dignity as the ultimate constitutional value must remain at the pinnacle.
More Columns
‘AIPAC represents the most cynical side of politics where money buys power’ Ullekh NP
The Radical Shoma A Chatterji
PM Modi's Secret Plan Gives Non-Dynasts Political Chance Short Post