JD Vance’s Pahalgam remarks put Pakistan in diplomatic crosshairs

/2 min read
Although the US VP advocated restraint, he asked Islamabad to cooperate with New Delhi to make sure that the terrorists are brought to justice
JD Vance’s Pahalgam remarks put Pakistan in diplomatic crosshairs
US Vice President JD Vance and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, New Delhi, April 21, 2025 

US Vice President JD Vance's pointed remarks following the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam have ratcheted up international pressure on Pakistan. The attack on tourists in the holiday spot in Kashmir, which claimed 26 lives, has reignited tensions between India and Pakistan and – surprisingly — Washington has taken a firmer tone than in previous regional flare-ups.

In a recent interview, Vance urged India to respond in a way that avoids a broader regional conflict, but notably stopped short of a neutral stance. "We hope, frankly, that Pakistan, to the extent that they're responsible, cooperates with India to make sure that the terrorists… are dealt with," he said, effectively acknowledging Pakistan's alleged harbouring of militant groups.

These remarks, echoed in Indian and US media, are being interpreted in New Delhi as a subtle yet significant endorsement of India's position. According to Indian officials, the United States is increasingly aligned with their view that Pakistan must be held accountable for cross-border terrorism.

Again, on May 1, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth spoke with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, only to affirm Washington's solidarity with India while also urging restraint. Though the Pentagon has not publicly accused Islamabad, Hegseth's outreach — when seen in the wake of Vance's remarks — signals a shift towards pressuring Pakistan diplomatically.

Open Magazine Latest Edition is Out Now!

The RSS Century

26 Sep 2025 - Vol 04 | Issue 40

The present and the future of Hindu nationalism

Read Now

Vance, known for his hawkish rhetoric, had previously sparked controversy by claiming the UK was at risk of becoming a "truly Islamist country with nuclear weapons." Critics argue his comments stoke geopolitical tensions, but allies see them as cutting through diplomatic ambiguity.

As India considers its next move — after having gone for diplomatic and digital retaliation — Pakistan finds itself increasingly isolated. Islamabad has denied any role in the Pahalgam attack and requested an international probe, but Vance's remarks have further constrained its room to manoeuvre.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)
Anusreeta Dutta is a columnist and political ecology researcher with prior experience as an ESG analyst