QUICK TAKE | Seven Things to Know About Darius Khambata's Exit From Tata Trusts

Last Updated:
The Harvard-trained senior advocate is declining another term at two key Tata trusts. His November 2 letter criticises the September boardroom developments and raises concerns about trustee independence
Philanthropic trusts own 66% of Tata Sons, the group’s principal holding company
Philanthropic trusts own 66% of Tata Sons, the group’s principal holding company Credits: ANI

1. Why is Darius Khambata in the news?

He has decided not to seek reappointment to the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Sir Ratan Tata Trust. In a November 2 letter to chairman Noel Tata and CEO Siddharth Sharma, he explained his decision and criticised developments at Tata Sons. His Dorabji Trust term ends on November 9.

2. Who is he?

Khambata is a senior advocate with an LLM from Harvard Law School. He practises before the Supreme Court, Bombay High Court and other courts and tribunals. He served as Maharashtra’s advocate general from 2012 to 2014, following three years as an additional solicitor general of India.

Sign up for Open Magazine's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

3. How did he become a Tata trustee?

He joined the two boards in November 2023, beginning a second stint with the trusts. In his letter, he said he had accepted the positions at Ratan Tata’s invitation. His earlier departure from the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust came in 2016.

4. Why does he not want another term?

Khambata said seeking the unanimous consent of fellow trustees for reappointment would compromise his independence. He acknowledged differences with other trustees, including Noel Tata, while saying Noel and Sharma wanted him to continue. The letter therefore describes his own decision to decline renewal.

open magazine cover
Open Magazine Latest Edition is Out Now!

The Era of Forever Wars

30 Oct 2026 - Vol 05 | Issue 44

Coping with an explosive Middle East

Read Now The Era of Forever Wars

5. What happened on September 17?

The Tata Sons board voted 4–1 to reappoint N Chandrasekaran as chairman, with Noel Tata opposing. Tata Trusts called the resolution legally invalid because it lacked the required support from trust nominee directors. Tata Sons subsequently defended its validity through legal opinions, Business Standard reported.

6. Why did Khambata object so strongly?

He said the September 17 developments had “sullied Tata Sons’ reputation”. He also opposed listing Tata Sons, arguing that it threatened the relationship between the holding company and its charitable owners. However, he supported finding an exit route for minority shareholder Shapoorji Pallonji Group.

7. Why does his departure matter?

Philanthropic trusts own 66% of Tata Sons, the group’s principal holding company. Their governance influences oversight of a vast business group and the charitable use of its wealth. Khambata’s departure removes an experienced legal voice as trustees debate leadership, listing and the future ownership structure.