
West Indies arrive at this T20 World Cup carrying one of cricket’s most intimidating legacies, and one of its most inconvenient truths.
They are two-time champions, the first team to dominate the format when chaos and power were virtues. But this edition finds them stripped of their most explosive batter, short on consistency, and still searching for an identity that matches modern T20 demands.
The question, then, isn’t whether West Indies can be dangerous. It’s whether they can be reliably good enough, often enough, to lift the trophy again.
Since their Super Eight exit at the 2024 T20 World Cup, West Indies have played 43 T20Is. They have won 14, lost 27, with two no results. Across 12 bilateral series, they have won just two.
That’s not a temporary dip. It’s a pattern. Losses have come at home and away, against elite teams and emerging ones: England, Australia, New Zealand, Afghanistan, Nepal. Even when West Indies fight, they often lose narrowly, a recurring theme that hints at fragility under pressure rather than bad luck.
No absence looms larger than Nicholas Pooran. He isn’t just West Indies’ highest T20I run-scorer; he was their tempo-setter, the batter who could flip matches in ten balls. Without him, the batting loses its most natural disruptor.
30 Jan 2026 - Vol 04 | Issue 56
India and European Union amp up their partnership in a world unsettled by Trump
The numbers underline the concern. West Indies’ collective batting average sits at 21.62, among the weakest of major teams. Their top seven averages just 22.4. In a World Cup where 180 is par, that margin matters.
The fireworks are fewer and the margin for error is thinner.
If West Indies are to defy the data, Shai Hope must be central to it.
Once an ODI specialist, Hope has reinvented himself as a credible T20 anchor. Since 2023, he has scored 1,151 runs at an average of 34.88 and a strike rate of 143.88, numbers that finally align stability with intent.
Alongside him, Sherfane Rutherford’s recent franchise form—particularly in the SA20—offers genuine optimism. Shimron Hetmyer remains a chaos merchant capable of turning games in minutes.
But there’s a catch: this batting group is form-dependent, not fear-inducing. They need sequences, not sparks.
If West Indies stay in games, it will often be because of their all-round depth. Romario Shepherd brings runs and wickets. Jason Holder still offers control, experience, and clutch moments. Akeal Hosein is the standout spinner, with 38 wickets at an average of 22.13, providing rare reliability.
Yet the supporting cast is uneven. Roston Chase’s decline—with both bat and ball—has hurt balance. Spin beyond Akeal looks thin. In subcontinental conditions, that’s a red flag.
But there is one undeniable advantage: exposure. West Indies players live in franchise leagues. Pressure, match-ups, and short-format problem-solving are second nature. On any given night, they can beat anyone.
So, how realistic are their chances?
West Indies are not favourites. They are not even among the top four most balanced teams. But they are dangerous outsiders. In Group C, they should progress if they handle Scotland and Italy efficiently. England will be the real test. Beyond that, their ceiling is high but their floor is low.
For West Indies to lift the trophy, three things must happen simultaneously. First, Hope must anchor consistently. Second, Hetmyer/Rutherford must supply sustained explosiveness. Third, Akeal Hosein must control the middle overs almost alone. That’s a narrow path but not an impossible one.
West Indies can still shake the tournament. Winning it, however, would require a level of consistency they haven’t shown in nearly two years.
(With inputs from ANI)