MSCI Adds Adani Energy, Lenskart, Groww and Laurus Labs. Why Does It Matter? Explained

Last Updated:
Four Indian stocks are joining MSCI’s India Standard Index from September 1, potentially drawing more than $1.5 billion in passive inflows. Astral, SBI Cards and Balkrishna Industries are being removed. Here’s why an MSCI reshuffle can move billions of dollars
MSCI indices are followed by huge pools of global capital. Index-linked ETFs and mutual funds try to mirror the benchmark they track. If MSCI adds a company, these funds typically need to buy the stock to keep their portfolios aligned
MSCI indices are followed by huge pools of global capital. Index-linked ETFs and mutual funds try to mirror the benchmark they track. If MSCI adds a company, these funds typically need to buy the stock to keep their portfolios aligned Credits: File picture

For most investors, an index change can sound like administrative housekeeping.

It isn’t. When MSCI adds a stock to one of its widely tracked indices, billions of dollars in global passive money can be forced to follow. That is why Adani Energy Solutions, Lenskart Solutions, Billionbrains Garage Ventures, the parent of Groww, and Laurus Labs are suddenly in focus after MSCI’s August 2026 review. Reuters reports that the four companies will enter the MSCI India Standard Index from September 1, while Balkrishna Industries, SBI Cards and Astral will exit. India’s weight in the benchmark is expected to edge up from 11.8% to 11.9%. So, what exactly changes?

Sign up for Open Magazine's ad-free experience
Enjoy uninterrupted access to premium content and insights.

Why does inclusion in an MSCI index matter?

Because MSCI indices are followed by huge pools of global capital. Index-linked ETFs and mutual funds try to mirror the benchmark they track. If MSCI adds a company, these funds typically need to buy the stock to keep their portfolios aligned. The reverse happens when a stock is removed. The Economic Times notes that trillions of dollars globally are benchmarked or linked to MSCI indices, which is why even routine index reshuffles can trigger large trading flows.

open magazine cover
Open Magazine Latest Edition is Out Now!

The Age of Anger

31 Jul 2026 - Vol 05 | Issue 31

A raging generation makes the government relent. What's next?

Read Now The Age of Anger

How much money could flow into the new stocks?

Potentially a lot. Reuters, citing estimates from Nuvama Alternative & Quantitative Research, says Laurus Labs could attract around $598 million, followed by Lenskart at $352 million, Adani Energy Solutions at $310 million and Groww at $256 million in passive flows. Together, that works out to more than $1.5 billion in estimated inflows. These are estimates, not guaranteed flows, but they explain why MSCI inclusion can immediately put a stock on institutional investors’ radar.

What happens to the stocks being removed?

They face the opposite pressure. Reuters estimates potential passive outflows of around $169 million from Balkrishna Industries, $143 million from SBI Cards and $138 million from Astral as funds tracking the benchmark rebalance their holdings. That does not mean the underlying companies have suddenly become weaker businesses. It means their place in the benchmark has changed.

Why is Adani Energy Solutions’ inclusion notable?

Because this isn’t the first time the stock has been in the MSCI conversation. In May, MSCI did not add Adani Energy Solutions to its global standard indices after the stock was placed on an “Ineligible Alert Board” linked to India’s Additional Surveillance Measure framework. The Economic Times reported that MSCI’s methodology prevented stocks under certain ASM categories from being added during that review. Three months later, Adani Energy Solutions has made the cut. That makes this inclusion particularly noteworthy for the stock.

Why are Lenskart and Groww interesting additions?

Because they reflect the changing composition of India’s listed market. Lenskart represents a consumer brand that has moved from startup status into the public markets, while Groww’s parent Billionbrains Garage Ventures represents India’s rapidly expanding digital-investing ecosystem. Their inclusion signals that newer consumer-tech and digital-first companies are increasingly large and liquid enough to enter benchmarks once dominated by older industrial, banking and conglomerate names. That is an inference from the changing index composition, but the shift itself is visible in MSCI’s latest additions.

What about Laurus Labs?

Laurus Labs had already been widely expected to move up from the MSCI Small Cap universe into the Standard Index. JM Financial had identified it as a high-probability migration candidate before the review, while Moneycontrol estimated that such a move could attract more than $550 million in passive flows. MSCI has now confirmed that move.

Are existing index stocks affected too?

Yes. A reshuffle isn’t only about companies entering and leaving. MSCI can also change the weight assigned to existing constituents. Reuters says Eternal could attract around $674 million in passive inflows following a weight increase, while Adani Enterprises and Adani Ports could also see fresh inflows. Reliance Industries, on the other hand, could see an estimated $523 million in outflows because of weight adjustments. That is why traders watch the entire MSCI review, not just the additions and deletions.

When do the changes actually happen?

The changes take effect after the close of trading on August 31, meaning the new index composition becomes effective from September 1, 2026. That often makes the final trading session before implementation particularly busy as passive funds rebalance.

So, does MSCI inclusion mean a stock will automatically rise?

No. It can create mechanical buying demand, improve liquidity and increase exposure to global institutional investors. But index inclusion is not the same thing as a recommendation to buy, and it does not guarantee long-term share-price gains. Once the rebalance is complete, fundamentals still matter. That is the key distinction. MSCI does not decide which company is “good”. It decides which stocks belong in the benchmark. And when one of the world’s most influential index providers changes that benchmark, global money often has little choice but to move with it.

(With inputs from ANI & yMedia)