
The administration of former US President Donald Trump has reportedly drawn up a controversial “naughty and nice” list categorising NATO allies based on their level of support during the ongoing conflict with Iran, according to Politico.
The document, prepared ahead of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte’s diplomatic visit to Washington earlier this month, is seen as a strategic attempt to reward supportive nations while potentially penalising those viewed as falling short of expectations.
A European diplomat told Politico that the idea appears to build on a concept first introduced in December by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. At the time, Hegseth had suggested that “model allies” would be granted “special favour” by Washington DC, while those failing to meet collective defence obligations could face consequences.
If implemented, the list could trigger significant policy shifts, including the relocation of US troops or restrictions on the sale of American defence technology to certain NATO members. However, observers remain sceptical about the effectiveness of such measures.
“They don't seem to have very concrete ideas when it comes to punishing bad allies. Moving troops is one option, but it mainly punishes the US, doesn't it?” a European official remarked to the publication.
While the White House has not officially confirmed the existence of the list, some countries are expected to fare better than others. Poland, for instance, has been recognised for its substantial defence spending, while Romania has allowed US forces access to its airbases for operations linked to the Iran conflict.
17 Apr 2026 - Vol 04 | Issue 67
Mamata Banerjee faces her toughest battle
In contrast, most NATO members have declined to participate in the Gulf hostilities, a stance that has drawn sharp criticism from Trump. Speaking at a recent event in Arizona, he expressed frustration at the alliance’s delayed response.
"I told them I would have liked your help two months ago, but now I really don't want your help anymore, because you were absolutely useless when we needed you," Trump stated.
He went further, asserting, "But actually, we never needed them. They needed us," underscoring his belief in US self-reliance amid growing geopolitical tensions.
Trump’s dissatisfaction has been consistent throughout the conflict. Following his meeting with Rutte, he took to social media to reiterate his stance, writing: "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN."
The latest friction adds to a long history of disagreements between Washington and its European allies, particularly over defence spending. Past tensions have also included Trump’s controversial interest in acquiring Greenland, highlighting an often strained transatlantic relationship.
(With inputs from ANI)