Stavanger Shock: Gukesh Defeats Carlsen in Classical First
Carlsen stood up, struck the table, and exclaimed, “Oh my God.” Across from him, the reigning world champion had just won a game he thought he was losing
D Gukesh at Stavanger in the sixth round of Norway Chess (Photo: Norway Chess/Michal Walusza)
From the time he first appeared on the live rating lists as a prodigy, Dommaraju Gukesh has measured himself not just by norms or titles, but by the shape and shadow of Magnus Carlsen. Even as he rose—through Olympiad boards, through Candidates qualification, through a tightly contested World Championship—he continued to say, insistently, that he wanted to beat Carlsen in a classical game.
That win came on 1 June 2025 in Stavanger, in the sixth round of Norway Chess. It didn’t come through dominance, but through resistance. Gukesh, with White, was on the back foot for most of the game. Carlsen, playing Black, chose the Berlin—quiet, constricting, and familiar—and guided the position into a complex endgame. The structure favoured him. His pieces moved more freely. And somewhere between position and initiative, he held something harder to name: control. Gukesh later said he had thought about resigning. He felt lost. But he stayed.
After defeating Gukesh in the opening round of the tournament, Carlsen had posted a line from The Wire on social media: “You come at the king, you best not miss.” It was a barbed flourish—half jest, half assertion—that gave shape to the competitive undercurrent between them. Indeed, Carlsen looked set to win—his pieces were more active, his structure more cohesive, and his control over the board more pronounced. For much of the game, Carlsen navigated the complexities with characteristic precision, pressing without overextending. Then, on move 52, with both players low on time, Carlsen played a knight check that appeared to maintain his advantage. The knight jumped forward, forcing the White king to move. But in doing so, it cleared a path rather than closing one. Gukesh’s king, which until then had been a bystander on the kingside, was now pushed toward the centre—toward activity. The check seemed to ask a question, but the answer favoured White. With the king suddenly better placed and a pawn ready to push, Gukesh’s position, which had been under strain for most of the game, began to breathe. There was a slow change in the current. What had been a slight pull in Black’s favour began to tilt the other way.
The moment has already been described by some as a turning point, a collapse, a drama. But none of those words fit quite right. In the post-game analysis, commentators noted that Carlsen’s earlier move, 44 f6, had already begun to erode his advantage, introducing weaknesses into his position. The subsequent 52 Ne2+ compounded these issues, providing Gukesh with the opportunity to seize the initiative. From that point, Gukesh played with remarkable accuracy, converting the advantage into a win.
This is the unforgiving nature of elite chess, where a single imprecise move, even if not a blunder, can alter the course of the game. Carlsen’s earlier dominance was not sufficient to secure the win; Gukesh’s resilience and precise play in the critical moments turned the tide.
Carlsen resigned on move 65 and struck the table sharply with his palm, gasping, “Oh my God” before apologising to Gukesh. The gesture rippled outward almost immediately, replayed in slow clips. It was rare to see him like that: not just defeated, but visibly unmoored. For a player long known for his emotional insulation—for not giving the cameras or the crowd anything they could hold on to—this was a crack in the usual opacity. Not a spectacle, but a moment of exposure.
Gukesh, for his part, remained still. When asked later what it felt like, to beat Carlsen in classical for the first time, he said, “I thought I was completely lost. But I just played on.” The understatement was in character. Even as reigning world champion, Gukesh still carries himself more like an analyst than a conqueror. Later, he described the victory as a “lucky day” and noted, “99 out of 100 times I would lose.” His humility stood in contrast to the high-stakes nature of the match and the surrounding narratives.
It is worth remembering what the expectations were. Though Gukesh is now the World Champion, Carlsen remains the benchmark. He knows the tournament, the time control, the terrain. Gukesh had never beaten him in a classical game. Not in Reykjavik, not in Wijk aan Zee, not in Bucharest. This was the first. That it happened in Carlsen’s home country, in his signature event, adds a layer of narrative, but the real significance lies elsewhere: Gukesh played a game in which he was worse, recognised it, and still found a way to win.
As of round six, Carlsen and Fabiano Caruana still lead the tournament. Gukesh is a point behind. The event remains open. But this game will be remembered. Not as a spectacle or a dethronement, but as a match played to the end.
Gukesh had wanted to beat Carlsen in a classical game. Not because it would prove anything definitive, but because it was, in some sense, a necessary step. Every generation tests itself against the one before. This was not a statement, but a checkmark. A game played across 65 moves, decided by patience. That it ended in his favour will matter—not for what it says about Carlsen, but for what it confirms about Gukesh: that he belongs not just among the best, but among those who stay at the board long enough to see the tide turn.
More Columns
India surpass US, UK, Japan in new ‘human flourishing’ study Ajay MK
Builder.ai and the Unravelling of a Startup Dream V Shoba
Cong Versus Senior Leaders over Op Sindoor Rajeev Deshpande